Breaking News
Nagaland Post Logo
You are here:  Skip Navigation LinksHome » Show story
Coalition war in Bihar
Published on 22 Mar. 2009 12:50 AM IST
Print  Text Size

It’s sonia versus lalu-paswan in bihar The cracks in the ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA) over seat sharing in Bihar widened Saturday, with the Congress deciding to go it alone after being rebuffed by partners Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and Lok Janshakti Party (LJP). The RJD retaliated by saying it could not help it if the Congress was unhappy. While announcing it was going solo in Bihar, the Congress was at pains to state that the UPA coalition was intact. RJD chief Lalu Prasad too said his party was very much part of the coalition. The Congress said there was no danger to the coalition and that the UPA partners could come together again after the elections. The party said it had no option but to go to the polls on its own in Bihar after the rebuff by the two allies. The Congress announced that it would contest 37 of the 40 seats in Bihar came after RJD leader Lalu Prasad and LJP’s Ram Vilas Paswan announced a pre-poll tie-up for Bihar, leaving just three seats for the Congress. The RJD would contest 25 and LJP 12. Reacting sharply to the Congress decision, Lalu Prasad said he could not give more than three seats to the party. “We will give only three seats to the Congress and there will be no reconsideration on this.” “We can’t help if the Congress is unhappy with the seat sharing in Bihar. During the last assembly elections, we left 90 seats for Congress, but they won only nine and that too with RJD’s support,” he said. Lalu Prasad, the railways minister, told reporters: “If the Congress wants to field its candidates they can, but (Congress chief) Sonia Gandhi will realise the importance of the RJD after the elections.” He challenged the party to “prove the mettle” of its candidates. The veteran leader from Bihar, however, stated that his party was in the UPA. “We are part and parcel of the UPA,” he said, and reminded the Congress that it was not “the only party in UPA, we are all there”. He said it was on the strength of all partners that the UPA government was formed. Earlier, speaking to reporters, Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh said the party was left with “no other option” but to go it alone. In reply to a question, Singh said there was no question of the UPA disintegrating since the alliance could always be formed after the elections, and hoped that “all secular parties will be united after the polls”. “Even in 2004, the UPA was formed after the elections.” The Congress has been smarting ever since the RJD and LJP distributed most of the Bihar seats among themselves earlier in the week. In a retaliatory move, the party did the same thing in neighbouring Jharkhand announcing seats on its own and leaving only two to RJD of the 14 seats in the state. Senior Congress leader Sushil Kumar Shinde said: “They (RJD and LJP) took the decision unilaterally to share the seats, leaving just three to us.” “It was only through the press that we came to know about it,” he added. “The last time we contested four seats and won three of them. Even that was also refused to us. My workers obviously feel insulted.” He said the Congress has left three seats for its allies in Bihar, “two from which Laluji is contesting and another seat of Paswanji”. Asked if it meant the end of the alliance, Shinde said: “This has nothing to do with the UPA government. It is intact. This is the business of the political parties; nothing to do with UPA.” Lok Sabha polls in Bihar will be held April 16, 23, 30 and May 7. Possibility of alliance with Cong over: Amar Singh While the Congress had already indicated that it was not inclined to a poll alliance with the Samajwadi Party in Uttar Pradesh, the final parting of ways came Saturday when Amar Singh said the “possibilities of an alliance have been frustrated”. “From our side, we were always keen on an alliance (with the Congress) and we had agreed to leave as many as 17 of Uttar Pradesh’s 80 Lok Sabha seats for them, but still they did not seem to be satisfied,” said Amar Singh, the Samajwadi Party general secretary. Amar Singh was speaking to the media at the end of a day-long state executive meeting here. Without naming All India Congress Committee (AICC) general secretary Digvijay Singh, he blamed the former Madhya Pradesh chief minister for the break-up. “I do not blame (Congress chief) Sonia Gandhi for this. Only one man is responsible for putting hurdles in the path of the alliance. I need not mention his name as everyone knows him. He does not belong to Uttar Pradesh but keeps coming here quite often,” said Amar Singh. He said the Congress “deliberately” insisted on fighting from 10 constituencies in which the Samajwadi Party has sitting MPs. “Some Congress leaders even chose to overlook the fact that it was because of those 10 members that Manmohan Singh was still occupying the prime minister’s office.” Amar Singh said his party won’t field any candidate against Sonia Gandhi in Rae Bareli and her son Rahul Gandhi in Amethi. However he warned that “if the Congress chooses to field anyone against (Samajwadi candidate) Sanjay Dutt in Lucknow, we will oppose (Congress’) Priya Dutt in Mumbai”.

Comments:(0) Login or Register to post your Comment
(Available for registered users only)
More News
  • 1
  • 2