Breaking News
Nagaland Post Logo
You are here:  Skip Navigation LinksHome » Show story
ULFA-govt talks mired in verbal duel
Published on 1 Jun. 2010 11:51 PM IST
Print  Text Size

Initiating the peace process with the outlawed United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) is getting mired in a verbal duel with both the government and the rebel leadership demanding that the initiative should come from the other side.
At a time when both the ULFA and the government have openly expressed their desire for holding peace talks, the issue is getting bogged down once again with formalities coming in the way of opening the negotiations. The question is who is going to bell the cat?
“Let the government first make a formal proposal for starting talks with us as we cannot do so as most of our leaders are in jail now,” ULFA vice chairman Pradeep Gogoi told IANS.
This is in response to a statement made by Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi Sunday when he asked the ULFA leadership to formally apprise the government about their willingness to hold peace talks. The Assam cabinet last week decided to open talks with the ULFA leadership even if such negotiations were held minus their elusive commander-in-chief Paresh Baruah.
Six top ULFA leaders are in jail and include chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa, deputy commander-in-chief Raju Baruah, self-styled foreign secretary Sasha Choudhury, finance secretary Chitrabon Hazarika, cultural secretary Pranati Deka and ULFA political ideologue Bhimkanta Buragohain.
ULFA publicity chief Mithinga Daimary and vice chairman Pradeep Gogoi were let out on bail two months ago after the prosecution did not oppose their bail plea - a move seen as an attempt by the government to let the two leaders drum up public opinion for opening talks.
The ULFA last week made a formal statement after a meeting between eight of their top leaders at the Guwahati Central Jail that talks could begin if six of their leaders were released from prison. “Let them tell us formally what they want to get the talk process going. Certain things require formalities and it is for the ULFA to make a formal proposal,” the chief minister said.
The ‘you first’ attitude by both the government and the ULFA could well lead to mistrust between the two sides and, in the process, delay the opening of the peace talks.
There are vague statements coming in from both sides. On Tuesday jailed United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) finance secretary Chitraban Hazarika said the government should create conducive atmosphere for talks.
Hazarika, however, parried a direct question as to what holds them back from making a formal proposal to the government expressing their willingness for talks and their preconditions like releasing the jailed leaders before any formal discussions. Questions are asked as to why the two sides are dilly dallying - why cannot there be a meeting point on holding talks? Further delay could only lead to confusion and give an edge to those not favouring talks within the ULFA.
The ULFA has put forward a set of three preconditions for talks and negotiations with the Indian government. The government has rejected these preconditions. The preconditions include the talks should be held in a third country, the talks should be held under United Nations supervision and the agenda of the talks should include the sovereignty of Assam.
In 2004, the ULFA dropped the first two preconditions and offered to talk with the government. The Government of India was not ready to negotiate on the issue of sovereignty. Still some progress was made when the ULFA formed a “People’s Consultative Group” in September 2005 to prepare the grounds for an eventual negotiation between the government and ULFA, which the government has welcomed.

Comments:(0) Login or Register to post your Comment
(Available for registered users only)
More News
  • 1
  • 2